<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
	<channel>
<title>3D Internet Law News Feed</title><link>http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/index.html</link><description>Virtual Worlds and Multiuser Online Games</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:creator>Stephen Wu</dc:creator><dc:rights>Copyright 2008 Cooke Kobrick &#x26; Wu LLP</dc:rights><dc:date>2010-03-17T08:44:27-07:00</dc:date><admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.realmacsoftware.com/" />
<admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:Stephen Wu" /><sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
<sy:updateBase>2000-01-01T12:00+00:00</sy:updateBase>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 09:07:51 -0700</lastBuildDate><item><title>Arizona State Program on Governance in Virtual Worlds - March 26&#x2c; 2010</title><dc:creator>Stephen Wu</dc:creator><category>None</category><dc:date>2010-03-17T08:44:27-07:00</dc:date><link>http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/e4e0f7ff903a6a2d18aec412b6671c88-44.html#unique-entry-id-44</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/e4e0f7ff903a6a2d18aec412b6671c88-44.html#unique-entry-id-44</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[On March 26, 2010, the Sandra Day O&rsquo;Connor College of Law at Arizona State University will hold a half-day symposium on the governance of virtual worlds.  The program will discuss issues arising from businesses and governments using virtual worlds.  The program is available live, on the web, and on Second Life.  Click <a href="http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=10150126984135375" rel="external">here</a> for more information about the program.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Teaching Virtual Worlds Law Again</title><dc:creator>Stephen Wu</dc:creator><category>General</category><category>Legal Education</category><dc:date>2010-02-16T10:09:00-08:00</dc:date><link>http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/6c8454115f168ce69d03a87f0c02159c-43.html#unique-entry-id-43</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/6c8454115f168ce69d03a87f0c02159c-43.html#unique-entry-id-43</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Last summer, I had the privilege of teaching Virtual Worlds Law with <a href="http://virtuallyblind.com/" rel="external">Benjamin Duranske</a> at Santa Clara University Law School.  I am excited to announce that I am in the process of setting up another summer session with the law school to teach the course again.  We have seen a number of developments in the area since last summer, most notably the Eros v. Linden case.  And I believe that Ben and I will be honing the course offering to make it even better this year.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>All Quiet in Playfish v. Rackspace</title><dc:creator>Stephen Wu</dc:creator><category>Intellectual Property</category><category>Trademark</category><category>Copyright</category><category>Metagaming</category><dc:date>2010-02-08T21:22:15-08:00</dc:date><link>http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/d50f54a3c5e865f5369922816297d693-42.html#unique-entry-id-42</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/d50f54a3c5e865f5369922816297d693-42.html#unique-entry-id-42</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[I recently checked the docket again in the Playfish v. Rackspace case.  See the post <a href="http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/03d62f7706c710361d899e1ed2f88107-29.html" rel="self">here</a> concerning the filing of the complaint in that case last fall.  The case has seen no filings, except for one, since the first month of the case, although the docket would not show some of the evidence gathering the parties may be conducting at the moment.  Nonetheless, the parties should be undergoing the case management process, which should yield some filings.  Consequently, there is some chance the parties are trying to settle the matter, or it has not been in Playfish&rsquo;s interest to pursue it. ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Eros v. Linden Update</title><dc:creator>Stephen Wu</dc:creator><category>Trademark</category><category>Copyright</category><category>Intellectual Property</category><dc:date>2010-01-30T16:26:42-08:00</dc:date><link>http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/abd7f554a019b60ed9174a03c614c6f9-41.html#unique-entry-id-41</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/abd7f554a019b60ed9174a03c614c6f9-41.html#unique-entry-id-41</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[The Eros v. Linden suit appears to have been relatively quiet since the Lindens answered the Eros complaint in November.  The most important development to report is the fact that the parties are moving forward with discovery and held a meeting to work out discovery and case management issues.  They filed a <a href="http://www.box.net/shared/y8n8ba9n9x" rel="external">case management statement</a> reporting the results of their meeting.  For a copy of the statement, click <a href="http://www.box.net/shared/y8n8ba9n9x" rel="external">here</a>.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Can Virtual Worlds Augment Reality?</title><dc:creator>Stephen Wu</dc:creator><category>None</category><dc:date>2010-01-23T16:55:53-08:00</dc:date><link>http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/9beb32835b699352f7c166da7bca29f7-40.html#unique-entry-id-40</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/9beb32835b699352f7c166da7bca29f7-40.html#unique-entry-id-40</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[I read with interest the news stories about an iPhone-controlled toy helicopter on display at the Consumer Electronics Show a few weeks ago.  Click <a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/business/ci_14152236" rel="external">here</a> for one such story.  At the show, a company called Parrot revealed the new toy foam helicopter remotely controlled by an iPhone over WiFi.  Parrot plans to roll out games, in which streaming video from the toy goes to the iPhone, and the iPhone screen displays &ldquo;augmented reality&rdquo; (AR).]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Are Patent Damages as Fictional as Second Life?</title><dc:creator>Stephen Wu</dc:creator><category>Intellectual Property</category><dc:date>2010-01-12T20:20:18-08:00</dc:date><link>http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/efbaf58caf48f531602327cfea47ab2b-39.html#unique-entry-id-39</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/efbaf58caf48f531602327cfea47ab2b-39.html#unique-entry-id-39</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[A recent federal court decision in Rhode Island mentioned Second Life, but not in the context of adjudicating a virtual worlds intellectual property dispute.  Instead, the court compared a reasonable royalty calculation of patent damages to <a href="http://secondlife.com" rel="external">Second Life&reg;</a> virtual world, saying that they both are &ldquo;make believe.&rdquo;  <em>Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.</em>, 632 F. Supp. 2d 147, 150 (D.R.I. 2009).]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Avatar Film May Drive Adoption of the 3D Internet</title><dc:creator>Stephen Wu</dc:creator><category>3D Technology</category><dc:date>2010-01-06T19:53:02-08:00</dc:date><link>http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/ec7a77765ec34b5f8dbcb2ad68b7d842-38.html#unique-entry-id-38</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/ec7a77765ec34b5f8dbcb2ad68b7d842-38.html#unique-entry-id-38</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Over the holidays, I took the plunge and actually saw the Avatar film.  I wrote my last post about the Avatar film after having read the dry text of articles trumpeting the pathbreaking nature of the film and its use of 3D to enhance the film&rsquo;s special effects.  Reading about the film and seeing the film are two very different things.  Now having seen the actual film - in 3D - I can see the promise of 3D much more clearly.  In fact, I now realize that not only will people want 3D technology to see existing 3D Internet spaces in 3D, it will drive people to demand that providers of 2D content create new 3D Internet applications.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Avatar Film Highlights Promise of 3D Technology</title><dc:creator>Stephen Wu</dc:creator><category>3D Technology</category><dc:date>2009-12-20T17:15:41-08:00</dc:date><link>http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/441644801b48323ccbb566dad2f6b2b9-37.html#unique-entry-id-37</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/441644801b48323ccbb566dad2f6b2b9-37.html#unique-entry-id-37</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[The conversation in this blog has been about the promise of the 3D Internet and the legal issues surrounding it.  With virtual worlds and MMOGs, we have enjoyed seeing 3D spaces on our 2D computer monitors.  (So far, no one has tried to push the use of the 3D glasses as a standard part of a 3D Internet offering.)  But with the critical acclaim of the movie Avatar, which people can view in 3D using polarized glasses, it is clear that people like 3D and will want it at home for their entertainment systems.  And once 3D screens can let us see 3D worlds in 3D, the natural next step is for virtual worlds and video games to use 3D technology to see 3D spaces.  It&rsquo;s coming.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>SLBA Adopts Corporate Bylaws</title><dc:creator>Stephen Wu</dc:creator><dc:subject>Stephen Wu&#x27;s blog covering cutting edge legal issues involving the 3D Internet&#x22;&#x3e;Blog</dc:subject><dc:date>2009-12-15T16:52:26-08:00</dc:date><link>http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/b2b2c14f51f33dfb6f6424ab9bdd07c3-36.html#unique-entry-id-36</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/b2b2c14f51f33dfb6f6424ab9bdd07c3-36.html#unique-entry-id-36</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[I haven&rsquo;t written too much before about the <a href="http://www.slba.info" rel="external">SL Bar Association</a>, but I am delighted to report that last Saturday, December 12, 2009, the SL Bar Association adopted new bylaws, following incorporation as a California nonprofit corporation.  The SL Bar Association strives to educate the bar and the public about legal issues concerning the <a href="http://secondlife.com" rel="external">Second Life&reg;</a> virtual world.  Adoption of the new bylaws document is a major step for the organization, and I hope that the SLBA continues its momentum in growing and doing more to serve members of the SL community of lawyers and people interested in the law.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Events of the Week</title><dc:creator>Stephen Wu</dc:creator><category>Business Models</category><dc:date>2009-12-08T21:47:51-08:00</dc:date><link>http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/81cffe9e2f2808f04e4ea9acfc0e7efe-35.html#unique-entry-id-35</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/81cffe9e2f2808f04e4ea9acfc0e7efe-35.html#unique-entry-id-35</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[I checked the dockets this week for the Eros v. Linden Research case and the Playfish v. Rackspace case, and the docket revealed no new filings.  These cases have been quiet, at least in terms of filings.  It may be that the parties are now exchanging requests for information to each other to begin the evidence-gathering process.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>What Happens to Your Virtual Property When You Die?</title><dc:creator>Stephen Wu</dc:creator><category>Estate Planning</category><dc:date>2009-12-02T06:40:15-08:00</dc:date><link>http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/453884923a451225ab038c8ed658eed1-34.html#unique-entry-id-34</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/453884923a451225ab038c8ed658eed1-34.html#unique-entry-id-34</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Virtual property is worth real money.  It may include virtual real estate in the <a href="http://secondlife.com" rel="external">Second Life&reg;</a> virtual world like <a href="http://www.anshechung.com/include/press/press_release251106.html" rel="external">Ansche Chung&rsquo;s real estate that exceed $1M US in value</a>, or may simply be trade secret source code or business plan that you store in some online backup storage service like <a href="http://mozy.com/" rel="external">Mozy</a>.  What happens to your virtual property held in your own name when you die?  People will now need to account for their virtual property in their estate plans.  It is not on the radar screens of estate planning lawyers, but it should be.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Controversy About Marketing Practices</title><dc:creator>Stephen Wu</dc:creator><category>Virtual Goods</category><dc:date>2009-11-22T22:41:27-08:00</dc:date><link>http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/55622d7996b658316166e89a1287143c-33.html#unique-entry-id-33</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/55622d7996b658316166e89a1287143c-33.html#unique-entry-id-33</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[On my <a href="http://www.facebook.com/stephen.s.wu?ref=profile" rel="external">Facebook page</a>, I recently wrote about a<a href="http://tinyurl.com/ydhzvkg" rel="external"> New York Times article</a> on the booming market for virtual goods, but now others have written that game companies are using unsavory methods for obtaining sales leads.  Now the lead generation practices have triggered a lawsuit in the Northern District of California.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>SL Bar Association Holds Mini-Conference on &#x22;Practicing Law in a Virtual World&#x22;</title><dc:creator>Stephen Wu</dc:creator><category>General</category><category>Legal Education</category><dc:date>2009-11-16T07:22:35-08:00</dc:date><link>http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/329d1ebc676f0263382f5e55a93cb549-32.html#unique-entry-id-32</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/329d1ebc676f0263382f5e55a93cb549-32.html#unique-entry-id-32</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[On Saturday, November 14, 2009, the <a href="http://www.slba.info" rel="external">SL Bar Association</a> held a mini-conference entitled "<a href="http://slbarassn.ning.com/events/practicing-law-in-a-virtual" rel="external">Practicing Law in a Virtual World</a>" hosted by the University of Florida's Fredric G. Levin College of Law on Gator Island in the Second Life&reg; virtual world  The speakers included leaders within the SL Bar Association.  The purpose of the confefrence was to introduce both practice issues and substantivie issues of practicing law in a virtual world, in the context of discussing career paths for law students.  For more information about the conference, click <a href="http://slbarassn.ning.com/events/practicing-law-in-a-virtual" rel="external">here</a>.  The SLBA will soon post a video of the conference.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Playfish to be Acquired by Electronic Arts</title><dc:creator>Stephen Wu</dc:creator><category>Intellectual Property</category><category>Copyright</category><category>Trademark</category><category>Metagaming</category><dc:date>2009-11-10T13:31:50-08:00</dc:date><link>http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/b305c0da2f2ef79730ce9208e05e56fc-31.html#unique-entry-id-31</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/b305c0da2f2ef79730ce9208e05e56fc-31.html#unique-entry-id-31</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Electronic Arts announced that it will acquire <a href="http://www.playfish.com/" rel="external">Playfish</a>, which has been pursuing a suit against San Antonio-based hosting company <a href="http://www.rackspace.com/index.php" rel="external">Rackspace Hosting, Inc.</a> and <a href="http://www.gosumall.com/" rel="external">GosuMall Digital Entertainment</a>, a Singapore company.  Playfish alleges that GosuMall is selling in-game items in an alleged violation of the Playfish terms of service, and that Rackspace is liable as well for hosting the GosuMall website at which it is selling the products.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Lindens Answer the Eros&#x2c; LLC Complaint</title><dc:creator>Stephen Wu</dc:creator><category>Trademark</category><category>Copyright</category><category>Intellectual Property</category><dc:date>2009-11-06T16:22:34-08:00</dc:date><link>http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/fa6423932d0fba62a62816be79f024dd-30.html#unique-entry-id-30</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/fa6423932d0fba62a62816be79f024dd-30.html#unique-entry-id-30</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[On October 30, 2009, Linden Research, Inc. and Linden Research International, Inc. filed an answer to the Complaint asserted against them by Eros, LLC and Shannon Grei in the Northern District of California.  The Lindens had the option of filing a motion to test the legal sufficiency of the Complaint, move the Court to dismiss for some other reason, or answer the Complaint.  And the Lindens chose to answer the Complaint (without filing a counterclaim against the plaintiffs).]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Report on Playfish v. Rackspace Complaint</title><dc:creator>Stephen Wu</dc:creator><category>Intellectual Property</category><category>Copyright</category><category>Trademark</category><category>Metagaming</category><dc:date>2009-10-23T15:20:38-07:00</dc:date><link>http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/03d62f7706c710361d899e1ed2f88107-29.html#unique-entry-id-29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/03d62f7706c710361d899e1ed2f88107-29.html#unique-entry-id-29</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[On September 14, 2009, London social gaming company <a href="http://www.playfish.com/" rel="external">Playfish, Ltd.</a>, sued San Antonio-based hosting company <a href="http://www.rackspace.com/index.php" rel="external">Rackspace Hosting, Inc.</a> and <a href="http://www.gosumall.com/" rel="external">GosuMall Digital Entertainment</a>, a Singapore company, which is an online seller of virtual game items.  The Complaint alleges that GosuMall is selling trademarked in-game items from Playfish's <a href="http://www.playfish.com/?page=game_pets&pf_ref=x1030" rel="external">Pet Society game</a>, in violation of Playfish's <a href="http://static.playfish.com/legal/terms.html" rel="external">Terms of Service</a>.  Click <a href="http://www.box.net/shared/micpttnske" rel="external">here</a> for a <a href="http://www.box.net/shared/micpttnske" rel="external">copy of the Complaint</a>.  As of today, the GosuMall Pet Society web page is still offering in-game items for sale.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>IP Megasuits Presentation at the Digital Law Conference</title><dc:creator>Stephen Wu</dc:creator><category>Intellectual Property</category><category>Trademark</category><category>Copyright</category><dc:date>2009-09-24T10:07:41-07:00</dc:date><link>http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/7e88dd476a0e4596f7a78c10a62256d4-28.html#unique-entry-id-28</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/7e88dd476a0e4596f7a78c10a62256d4-28.html#unique-entry-id-28</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<span style="font-size:13px; ">Yesterday, I gave a presentation </span>at the <a href="http://www.digitallawconference.com/schedule/index.html" rel="external">Digital Law Conference</a> on the topic of IP Megasuits, comparing the new <a href="../Trademark/Trademark/Eros_v_Linden.html" rel="self" title="&#34;&#62;Eros v. Linden Research Materials">Eros v. Linden case</a> to the Viacom v. YouTube and Google case.  Eros asserted direct and secondary copyright infringement, trademark infringement, and related state law claims against Linden Research, which operates the Second Life&reg; virtual world.  I posted the handout and PowerPoint slides on this site&rsquo;s <a href="../Trademark/Trademark/IP_Megasuit.html" rel="self" title="&#34;&#62;IP Megasuit Presentation at Digital Law Conference 2009">IP Megasuit Presentation page</a>.  Please write me at swu@ckwlaw.com if you would like to follow up on any questions you have about the program materials.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Intellectual Property Megasuit: Could It Happen to You?</title><dc:creator>Stephen Wu</dc:creator><category>Intellectual Property</category><category>Trademark</category><category>Copyright</category><dc:date>2009-09-22T22:49:49-07:00</dc:date><link>http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/e9bcf67407de3161aa67e6ced920c0d7-27.html#unique-entry-id-27</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/e9bcf67407de3161aa67e6ced920c0d7-27.html#unique-entry-id-27</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Tomorrow, September 23, I will be giving a presentation at the <a href="http://www.digitallawconference.com/" rel="external">Digital Law Conference</a> in San Jose, CA, entitled &ldquo;<span style="font:13px Arial, Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><a href="http://www.digitallawconference.com/schedule/index.html" rel="external">Intellectual Property Megasuit: Could It Happen to You?</a></span><span style="font:13px Arial, Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif; ">&rdquo;</span>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Breaking Story - Eros&#x2c; LLC Sues Linden Research</title><dc:creator>Stephen Wu</dc:creator><category>Trademark</category><category>Copyright</category><category>Intellectual Property</category><dc:date>2009-09-15T20:11:21-07:00</dc:date><link>http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/cf50d294b2e79fd7f999bac23e669376-26.html#unique-entry-id-26</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/cf50d294b2e79fd7f999bac23e669376-26.html#unique-entry-id-26</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Eros, LLC, a seller of virtual adult products in the Second Life<span style="font:12px Times, Georgia, Courier, serif; ">&reg;</span> virtual world, filed a class action suit today against the operator of Second Life<span style="font:12px Times, Georgia, Courier, serif; ">&reg;</span>, Linden Research, Inc., in the federal district court in San Francisco.  KamberEdelson, LLC is the law firm representing Eros and the other named plaintiff, Shannon Grei (SL:  Munchflower Zaius).  The Complaint contends that Linden is infringing upon the plaintiffs&rsquo; trademarks and Grei&rsquo;s copyrights directly, as well as facilitating and profiting from the infringements of others.  The plaintiffs seek unspecified damages, as well as injunctive relief.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Virtual Worlds Law Course at Santa Clara Univeristy Law School</title><dc:creator>Stephen Wu</dc:creator><category>Legal Education</category><dc:date>2009-08-26T16:43:49-07:00</dc:date><link>http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/ae81fa7164c00bb049cc3c0e4ffc5f19-25.html#unique-entry-id-25</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/ae81fa7164c00bb049cc3c0e4ffc5f19-25.html#unique-entry-id-25</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[This summer, I had the pleasure of teaching a <a href="http://law.scu.edu/academics/courses/virtual-world-law-999.cfm" rel="external">course in Virtual Worlds Law</a> (besides having an all-consuming spring and summer preparing for a trial).  I co-taught the course with <a href="http://www.pillsburylaw.com/index.cfm?pageid=15&itemid=22226" rel="external">Benjamin Duranske</a>, an attorney at Pillsbury.  And I will be following up with the course on this blog by sharing some thoughts about some of the virtual worlds law issues we explored.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Presentation at Suffolk Law School</title><dc:creator>Stephen Wu</dc:creator><category>General</category><category>Legal Education</category><dc:date>2009-02-22T22:35:53-08:00</dc:date><link>http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/3f01fca81c4ec1acb3d07276c2190830-24.html#unique-entry-id-24</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/3f01fca81c4ec1acb3d07276c2190830-24.html#unique-entry-id-24</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[On February 12, 2009, I had the pleasure and privilege of presenting a program entitled &ldquo;Virtual Worlds and Real Life Legal Issues&rdquo; at Suffolk Law School.  I was attending the American Bar Association Midyear Meeting in Boston that week.  Attorney <a href="http://www.businessandtechnologylawgroup.com/AboutUs.html" rel="external">Stephen Hollman</a>, an alumnus of Suffolk, arranged a series of talks at Suffolk by members of the <a href="http://www.abanet.org/scitech/" rel="external">American Bar Association Section of Science & Technology Law</a>.  I was one of those members having an opportunity to address the students at Suffolk.  I hope that more law schools will create programs and classes to discuss virtual worlds legal issues.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Minsky Case Settles</title><dc:creator>Stephen Wu</dc:creator><category>Trademark</category><category>Intellectual Property</category><dc:date>2009-02-09T20:31:09-08:00</dc:date><link>http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/b1ff7c72899e66e563eb0b8fe3c110a4-22.html#unique-entry-id-22</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/b1ff7c72899e66e563eb0b8fe3c110a4-22.html#unique-entry-id-22</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[On January 22, 2009, U.S. District Judge Lawrence E. Kahn signed an order dismissing Richard Minsky&rsquo;s case involving alleged trademark infringement in Second Life.  According to the Albany federal district judge&rsquo;s order, Magistrate Judge  David R. Homer reported to the Court that the parties had settled their case.  Accordingly, Judge Kahn dismissed the case.  The dismissal brings to an end the suit involving alleged infringement of Mr. Minsky&rsquo;s SLART federally registered trademark.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>New Confideniality Stipulation in Richard Minsky&#x27;s Lawsuit</title><dc:creator>Stephen Wu</dc:creator><category>Trademark</category><category>Intellectual Property</category><dc:date>2009-01-17T20:47:00-08:00</dc:date><link>http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/ce60269f031ad83c36a7812add783900-21.html#unique-entry-id-21</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/ce60269f031ad83c36a7812add783900-21.html#unique-entry-id-21</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[On January 15, 2009, Richard Minsky and Linden Research agreed to a stipulation regarding the treatment of confidential information exchanged during the discovery process in their Second Life trademark infringement case.  Judges routinely sign stipulated orders of this kind to allow the parties to exchange confidential information in the course of discovery while protecting the confidentiality of the information exchanged.  Otherwise, the docket reveals little activity during the holiday season.  A copy of the stipulation appears on the <a href="../Trademark/Trademark/Minsky.html" rel="external" title="&#34;&#62;Minsky v. Linden Research Materials">Minsky v. Linden Research documents page</a>.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Richard Minsky Appeals Order Denying Relief</title><dc:creator>Stephen Wu</dc:creator><category>Trademark</category><category>Intellectual Property</category><dc:date>2008-12-26T20:36:23-08:00</dc:date><link>http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/90a3faeb22a652ce6aca25d5456db245-20.html#unique-entry-id-20</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/90a3faeb22a652ce6aca25d5456db245-20.html#unique-entry-id-20</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[On December 18, 2008, Richard Minsky appealed the December 8 order in his Second Life trademark infringement case denying Mr. Minsky&rsquo;s motion regarding Linden Research&rsquo;s compliance with the temporary restraining order (TRO) in the case.  Mr. Minsky contended that Linden Research failed to comply with the TRO, but the magistrate judge disagreed.  Mr. Minsky now seeks to have the district judge on the case overturn the magistrate judge&rsquo;s order.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Applause for Benjamin Duranske</title><dc:creator>Stephen Wu</dc:creator><category>General</category><dc:date>2008-12-20T07:58:30-08:00</dc:date><link>http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/9d36e766cb21a243485d9b0f99bef8db-19.html#unique-entry-id-19</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/9d36e766cb21a243485d9b0f99bef8db-19.html#unique-entry-id-19</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[From January 21, 2007 until December 2, 2008, writer Benjamin Duranske served the 3D Internet legal world with his blog <a href="http://virtuallyblind.com" rel="external">Virtually Blind</a> with dedication and energy.  On December 2, Ben made his final post on his pathbreaking blog, and announced his new position as an attorney with the Silcon Valley office of Pillsbury.  I applaud Ben for his hard work and sharing of legal information concerning legal issues in virtual worlds and multiuser online games.  We will miss his blog, but look forward to his future publications.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Update on Minsky Trademark Infringement Suit</title><dc:creator>Stephen Wu</dc:creator><category>Trademark</category><category>Intellectual Property</category><dc:date>2008-12-10T22:07:23-08:00</dc:date><link>http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/d03f561f88388649373e700c5c7e7909-18.html#unique-entry-id-18</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/d03f561f88388649373e700c5c7e7909-18.html#unique-entry-id-18</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Since my last blog entry concerning Richard Minsky&rsquo;s Second Life trademark infringement case, Mr. Minsky asked the Court to drop the John Doe defendant -- an avatar named Victor Vezina -- from his case.  The Court granted Mr. Minsky&rsquo;s request on December 3, 2008.  In addition, on December 8, 2008, the Court denied Mr. Minsky&rsquo;s motion regarding Linden Research&rsquo;s compliance with the temporary restraining order in the case.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Minsky Spars with Rosedale and Kapor over Alleged Fraud in Minsky&#x27;s Second Life Trademark Infringement Case</title><dc:creator>Stephen Wu</dc:creator><category>Trademark</category><category>Intellectual Property</category><category>Fraud</category><dc:date>2008-11-25T21:30:44-08:00</dc:date><link>http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/769b3ecdea10c040f7859795323aaca8-17.html#unique-entry-id-17</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/769b3ecdea10c040f7859795323aaca8-17.html#unique-entry-id-17</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[In the past two weeks, Linden Research Chairman Philip Rosedale and former Chairman Mitch Kapor continued to spar with Richard Minsky in federal court filings concerning the fraud claims asserted against them by Mr. Minsky.  Mr. Minsky brought his action against Rosedale and Kapor, as well as Linden Research, to claim infringement of his federally registered trademark SLART.  Rosedale and Kapor recently filed a reply brief in support of their motion to dismiss the fraud claims against them, and Minsky&rsquo;s filing is an additional reply in opposition to their motion.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Richard Minsky Opposes the Motion to Dismiss in His Trademark Infringement Case Concerning Second Life</title><dc:creator>Stephen Wu</dc:creator><category>Intellectual Property</category><category>Trademark</category><dc:date>2008-11-09T21:42:16-08:00</dc:date><link>http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/97ad0da91caa8e07f192a2986bb92e7b-16.html#unique-entry-id-16</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/97ad0da91caa8e07f192a2986bb92e7b-16.html#unique-entry-id-16</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[This past week, Richard Minsky opposed the motion to dismiss his fraud claims against Linden Research Chairman Philip Rosedale, and former Chairman Mitch Kapor.  Rosedale and Kapor are defendants in Minsky&rsquo;s case, in which he asserts his rights to the federally registered trademark SLART against Linden Research.  Rosedale and Kapor sought dismissal of the fraud claims against them, and Minsky&rsquo;s opposition seeks to keep the fraud claims in the case.  I expect Rosedale and Kapor to file a reply brief in support of their motion, after which Judge Lawrence E. Kahn will rule on the motion.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Effect of the Presidential Election on the 3D Internet</title><dc:creator>Stephen Wu</dc:creator><category>Public Policy</category><dc:date>2008-11-05T11:38:49-08:00</dc:date><link>http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/7ef1fce7514e3d7d96686f5fa3db90bf-15.html#unique-entry-id-15</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/7ef1fce7514e3d7d96686f5fa3db90bf-15.html#unique-entry-id-15</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[America awoke this morning to a new President-Elect, Barack Obama, who swept to power in an historic election.  What does this important election mean for the 3D Internet?  President-Elect Barack Obama became the first presidential candidate to harness the real potential of the Internet in his bid to become president.  What will President Obama do for the 3D Internet during the next four years?]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Judge Enters Preliminary Injunction in the Minsky Second Life Trademark Infringement Case</title><dc:creator>Stephen Wu</dc:creator><category>Trademark</category><category>Intellectual Property</category><dc:date>2008-11-03T10:20:19-08:00</dc:date><link>http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/1c19ecf1b751941a328439b4ed15a311-14.html#unique-entry-id-14</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/1c19ecf1b751941a328439b4ed15a311-14.html#unique-entry-id-14</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Last week, Judge Lawrence E. Kahn signed a stipulated preliminary injunction in the Second Life trademark infringement case brought by Richard Minsky against Linden Research.  Under the stipulated order, the Court converted the temporary restraining order (TRO) in place in the case to a preliminary injunction.  The defendants in the case are Linden Research, two of its principals, and an anonymous avatar named Victor Vezina.  Mr. Minsky&rsquo;s suit claims infringement of his federally registered trademark SLART.  The purpose of a preliminary injunction is to hold the status quo in place during the pendency of a case.  The preliminary injunction will likely remain in effect until the case is resolved.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Linden Research and Richard Minsky Agree on a Preliminary Injunction in their Second Life Trademark Infringement Case</title><dc:creator>Stephen Wu</dc:creator><category>Trademark</category><category>Intellectual Property</category><dc:date>2008-10-27T15:29:35-07:00</dc:date><link>http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/f74320dfd39db9a35e30a9ce1dceaf1d-13.html#unique-entry-id-13</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/f74320dfd39db9a35e30a9ce1dceaf1d-13.html#unique-entry-id-13</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Last week, Richard Minsky and Linden Research agreed to convert the temporary restraining order (TRO) in place in their trademark infringement case to a preliminary injunction.  Mr. Minsky had sued Linden Research, two of its principals, and an anonymous avatar named Victor Vezina claiming infringement of his federally registered trademark SLART.  It is now up to Judge Lawrence E. Kahn to sign the proposed order converting the TRO to a preliminary injunction.  I expect Judge Kahn to sign the order, since judges typically abide by the parties&rsquo; wishes on pretrial proceedings and encourage collaboration and settlement.  Once that order is in place, it will likely remain in effect until the case is resolved.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Fairly Quiet Week for the Minsky SLART Second Life Trademark Infringement Case</title><dc:creator>Stephen Wu</dc:creator><category>Trademark</category><category>Intellectual Property</category><dc:date>2008-10-20T11:11:01-07:00</dc:date><link>http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/73f2d7611ecbe6468a38538c0adc3cb4-12.html#unique-entry-id-12</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/73f2d7611ecbe6468a38538c0adc3cb4-12.html#unique-entry-id-12</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Last week was a fairly quiet one for the trademark infringement case brought by Richard Minsky.  Mr. Minsky filed a reply letter brief in further support of his letter motion essentially seeking a declaration that Defendant Linden Research has failed to comply with the temporary restraining order (TRO) in the case.  Linden Research asked the Court to strike Mr. Minsky&rsquo;s reply brief from the record, saying that the Court&rsquo;s dispute resolution procedures set forth in the TRO do not permit reply briefs.  Mr. Minsky is known as ArtWorld Market on Second Life and claims ownership in the registered trademark SLART used with his art magazine.  He sued Linden Research, some of its principals, and an anonymous avatar named Victor Vezina claiming infringement of his SLART mark.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Defendants Respond in the Minsky SLART Trademark Infringement Case Concerning Second Life</title><dc:creator>Stephen Wu</dc:creator><category>Trademark</category><category>Intellectual Property</category><dc:date>2008-10-11T13:07:53-07:00</dc:date><link>http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/4e745aa7914aab79f331645e04eea3fe-11.html#unique-entry-id-11</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/4e745aa7914aab79f331645e04eea3fe-11.html#unique-entry-id-11</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[This past week, the defendants in the Minsky trademark infringement case responded with a number of their own court filings.  Richard Minsky had filed a trademark infringement lawsuit last summer against Linden Research, an avatar named Victor Vezina (named as a John Doe defendant), Linden Chairman Philip Rosedale, and former Chairman Mitchell Kapor in Albany&rsquo;s federal court.  Mr. Minsky is known as ArtWorld Market on Second Life and claims ownership in the mark SLART used with his art magazine.  Richard Minsky&rsquo;s recent letter brief claimed non-compliance with the temporary restraining order in place.  Linden Research defended its conduct in its own letter brief.  In addition, Kapor and Rosedale asked the Court to dismiss the claims against them.  Finally, Linden Research filed an answer and counterclaims document denying Mr. Minsky&rsquo;s allegations, asserting a number of defenses, and seeking its own relief in a counterclaim that includes infringement and cancellation claims.  Linden Research contends that Mr. Minsky infringed upon its SECOND LIFE and SL marks.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Minsky SLART Cancellation Proceedings Suspended</title><dc:creator>Stephen Wu</dc:creator><category>Trademark</category><category>Intellectual Property</category><dc:date>2008-10-09T22:16:37-07:00</dc:date><link>http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/e5ec5477306e394ddb16362ca27eb2e9-10.html#unique-entry-id-10</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/e5ec5477306e394ddb16362ca27eb2e9-10.html#unique-entry-id-10</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[On October 2, 2008, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board suspended the proceedings instituted by Linden Research, Inc. against Richard Minsky to cancel his SLART trademark used with his art magazine.  The Board&rsquo;s suspension effectively stops Linden Research from doing an end run around the federal lawsuit Mr. Minsky filed against Linden Research and others in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York.  The previous day, counsel for Mr. Minsky had filed a motion requesting the suspension, and the Board agreed that suspension was appropriate, citing a regulation permitting suspension of a Board proceeding in the event a civil suit would have a bearing on it.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Minsky v. Linden Research Letters</title><dc:creator>Stephen Wu</dc:creator><category>Trademark</category><category>Intellectual Property</category><dc:date>2008-10-05T17:11:40-07:00</dc:date><link>http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/3d0dc42d098cc64df7092f50818a13ef-9.html#unique-entry-id-9</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/3d0dc42d098cc64df7092f50818a13ef-9.html#unique-entry-id-9</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[This past week, both Richard Minsky and defense counsel sent letters to one of the Albany federal court judges presiding over his SLART trademark suit against Linden Research, an avatar named Victor Vezina (named as a John Doe defendant), Linden Chairman Philip Rosedale, and former Chairman Mitch Kapor.  Mr. Minsky sent a letter to Magistrate Judge David R. Homer, while defense counsel&rsquo;s letter went to District Judge Lawrence E. Kahn.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>American Bar Association Journal Article on Virtual Worlds</title><dc:creator>Stephen Wu</dc:creator><category>General</category><dc:date>2008-10-01T11:32:16-07:00</dc:date><link>http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/ff1f0efccf812869d2a83b2f37c35e3f-8.html#unique-entry-id-8</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/ff1f0efccf812869d2a83b2f37c35e3f-8.html#unique-entry-id-8</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[I am pleased to announce that the American Bar Association Journal&rsquo;s October 2008 issue contains an <a href="http://www.abajournal.com/magazine/as_worlds_collide/print/" rel="external">article about virtual worlds</a>.  The issue should be arriving in people&rsquo;s mailboxes soon.  I am one of the attorneys quoted in the article.  The article talks about:<br /><ul class="disc"><li>legal issues in virtual worlds</li><li>the eventual use of dispute resolution in virtual worlds</li><li>the <span style="color:#000000;"><a href="http://www.slba.info" rel="external">SL Bar Association</a></span></li><li><a href="http://www.abanet.org/abastore/index.cfm?section=main&fm=Product.AddToCart&pid=5450052" rel="external">Ben Duranske&rsquo;s Virtual Law book</a></li><li>the <a href="http://www.abanet.org/dch/committee.cfm?com=ST252000" rel="external">Virtual Worlds and Multiuser Online Games Committee</a> of the <a href="http://www.abanet.org/scitech/" rel="external">American Bar Association Section of Science and Technology Law</a></li><li>The American Bar Association Annual Meeting seminar on virtual worlds in New York this past summer.</li></ul>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Parties Moving Closer Together in Minsky Case</title><dc:creator>Stephen Wu</dc:creator><category>Trademark</category><category>Intellectual Property</category><dc:date>2008-09-29T15:45:30-07:00</dc:date><link>http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/a28dae5b0d6dad9232c0f736e9eeddf6-7.html#unique-entry-id-7</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/a28dae5b0d6dad9232c0f736e9eeddf6-7.html#unique-entry-id-7</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[On September 29, 2008, counsel for Linden Research and other defendants sent a letter to Albany federal court Judge Lawrence E. Kahn announcing an &ldquo;agreement in principle&rdquo; with Richard Minsky regarding part of the case Mr. Minsky brought against Linden Research:  whether or not the Court should issue a preliminary injunction.  A preliminary injunction preserves the situation the parties face while a case is pending, but is not a final resolution of the case.  Therefore, this &ldquo;agreement in principle&rdquo; does not portend an imminent settlement of the entire case, although it is a sign of open communications among the parties that may lead to an eventual settlement.  The defendants apparently are agreeable to converting the existing temporary restraining order into a preliminary injunction, thereby avoiding what appeared to be an expensive showdown on the motion for preliminary injunction with Mr. Minsky.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Briefing Schedule Set on Minsky Trademark Case</title><dc:creator>Stephen Wu</dc:creator><category>Trademark</category><category>Intellectual Property</category><dc:date>2008-09-21T21:16:23-07:00</dc:date><link>http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/047650bc9af618e475a6d0e2c21c29c8-6.html#unique-entry-id-6</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/047650bc9af618e475a6d0e2c21c29c8-6.html#unique-entry-id-6</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[On September 16, 2008, a federal judge in Albany, NY, Judge Lawrence E. Kahn, signed an order setting up the preliminary injunction showdown between Richard Minsky and Linden Research.  Minsky, whose SL avatar is ArtWorld Market, is seeking a preliminary injunction restraining the Lindens from infringing upon his U.S. Trademark SLART.  A hearing is set on the preliminary injunction for December 3, 2008.  Plaintiff Richard Minsky&rsquo;s opening brief is due on October 30, the Defendants&rsquo; brief is due November 5, and Minsky may serve a reply brief no later than November 10.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Insurance for Virtual Worlds Businesses</title><dc:creator>Stephen Wu</dc:creator><category>General</category><dc:date>2008-09-17T17:27:10-07:00</dc:date><link>http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/4ec387e5734aeb7d4025ce8e9077b4f6-5.html#unique-entry-id-5</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/4ec387e5734aeb7d4025ce8e9077b4f6-5.html#unique-entry-id-5</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[I received an email the other day that contained a very interesting question.  The person asked my opinion as to whether it would be a good idea for virtual worlds businesses to obtain insurance.  The person had in mind companies like <a href="http://www.electricsheepcompany.com/" rel="external">The Electric Sheep Company</a>.  I wrote back to say that obtaining insurance is a good idea, and there may be some general insurance products out there that virtual worlds businesses can consider.  Unfortunately, however, I don&rsquo;t believe the market for insuring virtual worlds risks is mature enough yet to have virtual world-specific coverages.  A number of factors are barriers to carriers rolling out virtual world-specific coverages today.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Defendants Seek to Dissolve Minsky Restraining Order</title><dc:creator>Stephen Wu</dc:creator><category>Trademark</category><category>Intellectual Property</category><dc:date>2008-09-14T15:30:46-07:00</dc:date><link>http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/9e35b6a181dfda220e32d5969510fd95-4.html#unique-entry-id-4</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/9e35b6a181dfda220e32d5969510fd95-4.html#unique-entry-id-4</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[The defendants in the Minsky v. Linden Research case entered their appearance in Court this week and sought to dissolve the temporary restraining order entered against them on September 4, 2008.  The Court will create a schedule for briefing and a hearing on whether the Court should issue a preliminary injunction against the defendants during the case.  Mr. Minsky filed a reply in support of his motion for temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction.  In the end, the Court entered a modified temporary restraining order pending the preliminary injunction hearing.  The TRO implements a trademark take down procedure by which Mr. Minsky can continue to bring infringements to the attention of the Lindens for action.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Trademark Infringement Presentation</title><dc:creator>Stephen Wu</dc:creator><category>Trademark</category><category>Intellectual Property</category><dc:date>2008-09-13T22:41:00-07:00</dc:date><link>http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/9479b0d063f717b703a896d456935d0c-3.html#unique-entry-id-3</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/9479b0d063f717b703a896d456935d0c-3.html#unique-entry-id-3</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img class="imageStyle" alt="SLBA TM Presentation" src="http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/SLBA TM Presentation.jpg" width="492" height="332"/><br /><br /><span style="font:12px &#39;Lucida Grande&#39;, LucidaGrande, Verdana, sans-serif; ">On September 9, 2008, I gave a presentation entitled &ldquo;</span><span style="font:12px &#39;Lucida Grande&#39;, LucidaGrande, Verdana, sans-serif; "><u><a href="http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Trademark/page13/page13.html">Trademark Infringement in Virtual Worlds&rdquo; at the SL Bar Association in Second Life</a></u></span><span style="font:12px &#39;Lucida Grande&#39;, LucidaGrande, Verdana, sans-serif; ">.&rdquo; I gave an excerpt from the presentation the following day at a Bar Association of San Francisco program entitled &ldquo;Hot Topics in Business & Technology Law.&rdquo;<br /><br />Trademark infringement is widespread in Second Life and costs retailers millions. Although the amount of money lost in virtual worlds is small in comparison to the entire retail market, brand owners that fail to &ldquo;police&rdquo; their marks by pursuing infringers may lose the ability to enforce their trademark rights in the future. The presentation discussed the basics of trademark law, the significance of the virtual worlds infringement problem, the reasons why increasing infringement and the passage of time may erode the value of a trademark, and what owners can do to combat infringement. For a copy of the slides from the presentation, click </span><span style="font:12px &#39;Lucida Grande&#39;, LucidaGrande, Verdana, sans-serif; "><u><a href="http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Trademark/page13/page13.html">here</a></u></span><span style="font:12px &#39;Lucida Grande&#39;, LucidaGrande, Verdana, sans-serif; ">.</span>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Minsky v. Linden Research Update</title><dc:creator>Stephen Wu</dc:creator><category>Trademark</category><category>Intellectual Property</category><dc:date>2008-09-09T06:42:16-07:00</dc:date><link>http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/16bdc8552c159999d894a3f256d110af-2.html#unique-entry-id-2</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/16bdc8552c159999d894a3f256d110af-2.html#unique-entry-id-2</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[On July 29, 2008, artist and art critic Richard Minsky filed suit against against Linden Research, an avatar named Victor Vezina (named as a John Doe defendant), Linden Chairman Philip Rosedale, and former Chairman Mitch Kapor in Albany&rsquo;s federal court.  Mr. Minsky&rsquo;s avatar in SL is ArtWorld Market, and he is attempting to enforce his SLART trademark used with his art magazine.  He filed an amended complaint on August 14.  I posted the court documents about the case on my <a href="../Trademark/Trademark/Minsky.html" rel="external" title="&#34;&#62;Minsky v. Linden Research Materials">Minsky v. Linden Research documents page</a>.  Mr. Minsky obtained a temporary restraining order against the defendants, prohibiting them from infringing on his mark.  A hearing to determine if the court should issue a preliminary injunction will take place tomorrow.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Presentation on Trademark Infringement in Virtual Worlds</title><dc:creator>Stephen Wu</dc:creator><category>Trademark</category><category>Intellectual Property</category><dc:date>2008-09-08T15:39:41-07:00</dc:date><link>http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/ee763111cbc354e5306aaa356309f0b5-1.html#unique-entry-id-1</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/ee763111cbc354e5306aaa356309f0b5-1.html#unique-entry-id-1</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[I will be giving a talk in SL tomorrow on Trademark Infringement in Virtual Worlds before the SL Bar Association at its <a href="http://slurl.com/secondlife/Malfelonius/209/69/61" rel="external">offices</a>, noon PDT/SLT.  You can register for the talk by going to the <a href="http://slba.info/speakers/wu.html" rel="external">registration page</a>.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Welcome to the 3D Internet Law Blog</title><dc:creator>Stephen Wu</dc:creator><category>General</category><dc:date>2008-08-31T22:14:00-07:00</dc:date><link>http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/882f29e6b158ea37cd894f71b87e537d-0.html#unique-entry-id-0</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.3dinternetlaw.com/Blog/files/882f29e6b158ea37cd894f71b87e537d-0.html#unique-entry-id-0</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[It&rsquo;s inevitable.  We&rsquo;re in the process of moving from a 2D Internet -- one like magazine pages, with maybe some video, audio, and animation -- to an immersive 3D Internet.  You may have heard of the <a href="http://secondlife.com" rel="external">Second Life&reg;</a> virtual world, a service of <a href="http://lindenlab.com" rel="external">Linden Lab</a> in San Francisco.  It&rsquo;s the most prominent virtual world in use, but there are others -- There(sm) and Entropia Universe&reg;.  All of these virtual world Internet applications let users  control on-screen characters, called &ldquo;avatars,&rdquo; that walk in and around what seem to be buildings, stroll by the lakeshore, fly through the air, and ride virtual vehicles.  The technology powering these virtual worlds has a lot in common with multiuser online games, such as <a href="http://www.worldofwarcraft.com" rel="external">World of Warcraft&reg;</a>, <a href="http://www.everquest.com" rel="external">EverQuest&reg;</a>, and <a href="http://www.cityofheroes.com" rel="external">City of Heroes/City of Villains&reg;</a>.  Regardless, it is just a matter of time before business 3D Internet &ldquo;sites&rdquo; or applications are just as common as 2D websites.<br /><br />With the adoption of the 3D Internet comes new legal issues -- and we&rsquo;re just beginning to see what they are.  For instance, do items of virtual &ldquo;property&rdquo; constitute legally-recognizable property, with rights and obligations that go along with property law?  What happens when conduct in games or virtual worlds infringe -- or at least appear to infringe -- intellectual property rights?  What governments or sets of courts have jurisdiction over behavior in 3D Internet applications? All of these legal questions, and many more still await definitive answers.<br /><br />In the meantime, we have only limited legal precedents, statutory law, and regulations to guide companies hosting 3D applications, businesses establishing presences in virtual worlds, and users.  The hosting companies have created their own private law by way of contract through their online &ldquo;terms of service,&rdquo; which they hope will be enforced in court.  Public and private law, however, still leave many gaps, and many legal questions remain unanswered.<br /><br />I welcome you to this website and blog.  In these pages, I hope to fill in the gaps in the law, and provide some information and thoughts concerning the direction of the law.<br /><br />Before I close my first blog here, I would like to thank Benjamin Duranske, the author of a terrific new book entitled <a href="http://www.abanet.org/abastore/index.cfm?section=main&fm=Product.AddToCart&pid=5450052" rel="external">Virtual Law</a>, for his foresight in creating his blog, <a href="http://virtuallyblind.com" rel="external">Virtually Blind</a>, and essentially pioneering a new practice area for lawyers -- virtual law.  In fact, he wrote a fantastic book on the subject, called <a href="http://www.abanet.org/abastore/index.cfm?section=main&fm=Product.AddToCart&pid=5450052" rel="external">Virtual Law</a>.  He also had a forceful <a href="http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/07/16/benjamin-duranske-wsj-op-ed/" rel="external">op-ed piece in the Wall Street Journal </a>recently, calling on the mainstream media to recognize the advent of the 3D Internet.  Ben, and two other pioneers, Sean Kane and Cristina Burbach are doing a great job with their <a href="http://www.abanet.org/dch/committee.cfm?com=ST252000" rel="external">Virtual Worlds and Multiuser Online Games Committee</a> of the <a href="http://www.abanet.org/scitech" rel="external">American Bar Association Section of Science and Technology Law</a>.  I thank them all for their enthusiasm and service to the Section.<br /><br />Steve Wu<br />August 31, 2008]]></content:encoded></item></channel>
</rss>